V 1.5.3 check list

dmitryf

There is quick check list after upgrade to 1.5.3

1. Still problem to move mail in archive folder, if mail account is not Google. Doesn't work with localhost as example. Solution is here ~~[url=http://forum.epesibim.com/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=1702&start=15#p6171]~~viewtopic.php?f=6&t=1702&start=15#p6171[/url]

2. Now, if I deleted mail from archive, I can archive it anymore again.

3. When I reply to mail from archive it still use default account instead of account been used for that mail and add line "On 11 Jul 2013 14:52:27, Name <mail@mail.xx> wrote:" in wrong place, above signature.
(need workarround at least to get out text "On..." before signature, wrong mail account also quite annoying)

dmitryf

4. Threaded view in archive doesn't work. Major problem!
When I open mails related to company or contact, threaded view mix mail from different contacts/companies, there are mails in thread which doesn't belong to selected contact/company, icon to roll out thread is missing. When I open thread, there are unrelated mails there and mails from another contacts.
Flat view works fine and doesn't show messages which not related to contact and been shown in threaded view.

ajb

Sorry, we encountered an error while displaying this content. If you're a user, please try again later. If you're an administrator, take a look in your Flarum log files for more information.

dmitryf

[quote="ajb":3qa2zzmt]
1. Did you set IMAP root in email settings to "INBOX" ? Please try this
Now you should see added code in epesi_archive.php
[/quote:3qa2zzmt]
Thanks, It works! It even works without any code modification, just set IMAP Root as "INBOX." (including dot at the end).

2. It works too! Just remember that message should be deleted from flat view tab))).

3. I setup Roundcube to put reply above original message and signature below my text and above quote, and "On ..." goes above signature, that is wrong.

ajb

1. Dot is not necessary as it's trimmed and added by us to be sure that there is only one dot.
2. Threads need some improvements - it's sure.
3. I didn't know that we can do that. In fact it would be better to invoke RoundCube internal "reply" method - it would unify signature settings. I don't know is this possible or not.

Regards
Adam

Epesi ENS | Epesi Academy | epesi.cloud PaaS | GitHub

Help Me! | Download from SourceForge